Thanks for that link. I've seen that page before, but had a heck of a time finding it again. I saved it for future reference.
That was the same packing that Odessit commented about
on his last post on this page. I'll quote what he said about it:
SPP excels the cutted stainless scrubbies on all indexes. For example, evenness of piling. The cutted stainless scrubbies is laid unevenly, a column chokes and works bad.
I can imagine that the cut scrubbers are flimsy and the spirals can interlock creating dense spots causing restriction wherever this occurs. I can see that this can NEVER happen by fiddling with the sample springs I received … they just can not interlock. These are steel or stainless steel though so I imagine that copper springs are more pliable unless they use are more rigid/stronger copper wire. These steel springs cannot interlock even when I smash them together as hard as I can squeeze with my fingers. These sample springs are slightly out of specification (slightly larger diameter wire, slightly smaller OD spiral and a tad too long). kol2nas stated
on this page what the ideal dimensions of SPP should be. I have no idea where he read this, but I assume it was from one of the Russian threads:
Measurements for the optimal performance must be:
diameter of packing 1/10 to 1/12 diameter of column
diameter of SS wire 1/10 diameter of packing
That is precisely why I was wondering if a circular spring of the exact same dimensions as SPP (wire diameter, spring diameter, spring length) would work similar to SPP. I'm sure the prismatic aspect of the SPP would be ideal, but critical enough to its function to not use a circular spiral? As you've stated there is practically no portion of SPP that does not provide a horizontal plane for the reflux to become separated regardless how the SPP is laying. I'm just wondering if this 'prismatic' quality if just one step forward to optimize performance in theory or if it is critical.
I've sent a PM to Odessit about this. Hopefully he responds. Even if Odessit has a vested interest in SPP he seems to be an honest guy. Someone had to try regular spirals prior to making a much more difficult prismatic spiral.
Copper & stainless mesh is definitely WAY cheaper than any spring or SPP so I'm sure I'll use it. I just like the sound of a loose packing that can be poured out, easily washed, stored if need be and poured right back into the column.